Description
When working cross platform, in particular when producing a dylib from Rust and then again consuming it, the current resolution of #[link(name = "mylib"]
is somewhat confusing.
-
If you start developing on Windows, Rust will produce a
mylib.dll
andmylib.dll.lib
. To use this lib again from Rust you will have to specify#[link(name = "mylib.dll")]
, thus giving the impression that the full file name has to be specified. On Mac, however,#[link(name = "libmylib.dylib"]
will fail (likewise Linux). -
If you start developing on Mac and Linux,
#[link(name = "mylib")]
just works, giving you the impression Rust handles the name resolution (fully) automatically like other platforms that just require the base name.
In fact, the correct way to cross platform link against a dylib produced by Rust seems to be:
#[cfg_attr(all(target_os = "windows", target_env = "msvc"), link(name = "dylib.dll"))]
#[cfg_attr(not(all(target_os = "windows", target_env = "msvc")), link(name = "dylib"))]
extern "C" {}
Since according to this issue the current behavior can't be fixed and is "stable", I believe this should be documented somewhere. For me, the #[link]
attribute was where I started my debug journey originally.
The documentation could be something like:
Note that on Mac and Linux
name
is the base name of the actual library (e.g.,#[link(name = "mylib")]
if you want to link againstlibmylib.so
). On Windows, the base name of the.lib
file has to be provided.For 3rd party libraries such as
mylib.dll
andmylib.lib
, this still equals#[link(name = "mylib")]
, but for Rust produced library pairsmylib.dll
andmylib.dll.lib
a#[link(name = "mylib.dll")]
is needed instead.
Update - Changed #[cfg_attr]
to be more correctish ...
Activity
Havvy commentedon Jul 15, 2019
The documentation you provided is written in a more guide-like style than (to quote Centril on Discord) a "definition-style spec text", but the information is there. Do you want to take your hand at improving that section? You definitely know more about the link attribute than I do.
ralfbiedert commentedon Jul 15, 2019
Sure, I can try a PR.
rossy62 commentedon Jul 8, 2021
Is there any information on why Rust produces mylib.dll then mylib.dll.lib and mylib.dll.exp in windows instead of mylib.exp and mylib.exp which is what the windows linker expects? At the moment I'm renaming these outputs to mylib.exp and mylib.lib
Perhaps I'm missing something but in windows when I produce a DLL I will get *.dll and only get *.lib and *.exp if there are exports, but when I have symbols exported I get *.dll *.lib and *.exp.
This issue of #link only applies to linking these modules to RUST libraries.
But as a user trying to integrate RUST into native C I found this naming issue to be a burden. I have to add a post build step to rename the files I think long term. But if the build system could be coerced into producig mylib.lib and mylib.exp then that would be ideal. Just trying to understand why it works the way it does.