Skip to content

Tracking issue for pin ergonomics #130494

Open
1 of 1 issue completed
Open
Tracking Issue
1 of 1 issue completed
@traviscross

Description

@traviscross
Contributor

This is a tracking issue for work on pin ergonomics.

The feature gate for the issue is #![feature(pin_ergonomics)].

About tracking issues

Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation. They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions. A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature. Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.

Steps

  • Approve as lang experiment.
    • We accepted this experiment in the 2024-09-18 lang triage meeting.
  • Accept an RFC.
  • Implement pin reborrowing in nightly.
  • Implement pin autoref in nightly.
  • Implement &pin const / &pin mut constructor syntax in nightly.
  • Implement &pin const / &pin mut type syntax in nightly.
  • Implement &pin const self / &pin mut self argument syntax in nightly.
  • Implement #[pin] struct field annotations and drop changes in nightly.
    Investigate affordances for unsafe parts of the Pin API.
  • Add documentation to the dev guide.
  • Add documentation to the reference.
  • Add formatting for new syntax to the style guide.
  • Stabilize.

Unresolved Questions

TODO.

Related

TODO.

cc @eholk @rust-lang/lang

Sub-issues

Sub-issues

1 of 1 Issues completed

Activity

added
C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC
I-lang-nominatedNominated for discussion during a lang team meeting.
T-langRelevant to the language team
on Sep 17, 2024
changed the title [-]Tracking Issue for pin ergonomics[/-] [+]Tracking issue for pin ergonomics[/+] on Sep 17, 2024
added
B-experimentalBlocker: In-tree experiment; RFC pending, not yet approved or unneeded (requires FCP to stabilize).
on Sep 18, 2024
traviscross

traviscross commented on Sep 19, 2024

@traviscross
ContributorAuthor

We accepted this experiment in the 2024-09-18 lang triage meeting.

Thanks to @eholk for pushing this forward.

added a commit that references this issue on Sep 20, 2024

Rollup merge of rust-lang#130526 - eholk:pin-reborrow, r=compiler-errors

fe5f734
added a commit that references this issue on Sep 20, 2024
added a commit that references this issue on Oct 2, 2024

Auto merge of rust-lang#130633 - eholk:pin-reborrow-self, r=compiler-…

24 remaining items

Loading
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

B-experimentalBlocker: In-tree experiment; RFC pending, not yet approved or unneeded (requires FCP to stabilize).C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCF-pin_ergonomics`#![feature(pin_ergonomics)]`T-langRelevant to the language team

Projects

Status

Exploration

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

      Participants

      @eholk@traviscross@jieyouxu

      Issue actions

        Tracking issue for pin ergonomics · Issue #130494 · rust-lang/rust