Skip to content

Implement SHA1 in standard library #228

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
graydon opened this issue Feb 18, 2011 · 1 comment
Closed

Implement SHA1 in standard library #228

graydon opened this issue Feb 18, 2011 · 1 comment
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Comments

@graydon
Copy link
Contributor

graydon commented Feb 18, 2011

We need a reasonable cryptographic hash function to use as part of name mangling in rustc. Linkage will need this eventually.
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Feb 21, 2011

Implement sha-1 in standard library. Closed by cbe8d22

kazcw pushed a commit to kazcw/rust that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2018
@gwenn @alexcrichton
sse2: _mm_stream_* (rust-lang#228)
cee4f5f 
* sse2: _mm_stream_si128,si32,pd,si64

* sse2: _mm_stream_* tests

* Disable assert_instr for _mm_stream_si64
rchaser53 pushed a commit to rchaser53/rust that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2019
@nikomatsakis
Merge pull request rust-lang#228 from tmandry/traits-slg
fe35892 
Add traits SLG solver section
matthiaskrgr pushed a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2023
@antoyo
Merge pull request rust-lang#228 from sadlerap/simd-as
235414e 
simd: enable simd_as intrinsic
celinval pushed a commit to celinval/rust-dev that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2025
@kahlstrm
Fix intrinsics challenge typo in summary (rust-lang#228)
b0fdecf 
This PR fixes a minor typo in `SUMMARY.md` I noticed while browsing
through the site.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@graydon @brson