Closed
Description
fn main() {
1.bar();
}
Compiling this gives:
error: attempted access of field `bar` on type `<VI0>`, but no field or method with that name was found.
I'm guessing that the compiler hasn't inferred a type for <VI0>
, but it should probably be more explicit about this fact rather than spitting out something that looks like a compiler error. Nothing fancy, it could just look like:
error: attempted access of field `bar` on type `<unknown integral type>`, but no field or method with that name was found.
(Here I'm presuming that a type like <VI0>
is known to be integral, where this error occurs more generally it might say <V0>
, which should simply become <unknown type>
.)
If this can happen in other error messages it should be improved there as well.
Here's a test case with another error message that would likely be improved by the fixing this bug:
trait T {
fn foo();
}
fn bar<V: T>(v: @V) {
v.foo();
}
fn main() {
bar(5);
}
Current output:
5124.rs:10:8: 10:9 error: mismatched types: expected `@<V0>` but found `<VI0>` (expected @-ptr but found integral variable)
5124.rs:10 bar(5);
^
Suggested fixed output:
5124.rs:10:8: 10:9 error: mismatched types: expected `@<unknown type>` but found `<unknown integral type>` (expected @-ptr but found integral variable)
5124.rs:10 bar(5);
^
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Type
Projects
Milestone
Relationships
Development
No branches or pull requests
Activity
pnkfelix commentedon Mar 25, 2013
Not critical for 0.6; de-milestoning
catamorphism commentedon May 23, 2013
Nominating for milestone 5, production-ready
pnkfelix commentedon Jun 27, 2013
accepted for production ready
bstrie commentedon Jul 2, 2013
Updated with the test case for #5124.
pcwalton commentedon Aug 26, 2013
Triage bump
mo commentedon Dec 25, 2013
Another example is this snippet:
repro.rs:3:8: 3:22 error: binary operation || cannot be applied to type
<VI0>
Ideal error imo would be:
repro.rs:3:8: 3:22 error: binary operation || cannot be applied to integral types
pnkfelix commentedon Jan 22, 2014
we believe this is fixed, or at least the message quality has been improved.
pnkfelix commentedon Jan 22, 2014
closing as believed to be fixed.
alexcrichton commentedon Jan 22, 2014
This appears fixed by #11513
sorted configuration docs (rust-lang#3723)
Auto merge of rust-lang#3723 - RalfJung:win-tls-callback, r=RalfJung