Skip to content

[NLL] Should this code compile with NLL? #67201

Closed
@quixoticaxis

Description

@quixoticaxis

Here's the code:

fn main() {
    let mut v = vec![1, 2, 3];
    v.swap(0, v.iter().position(|num| *num == 3).unwrap());
}

Should this code compile? And what is the right place to ask questions about it?
I've got here following some awesome rustaceans' advises to read this RFC and then this tracking issue.

Activity

jonas-schievink

jonas-schievink commented on Dec 10, 2019

@jonas-schievink
Contributor

No, I believe this needs full two-phase borrows (#46901).

And what is the right place to ask questions about it?

It's best to ask question on the user forum, the /r/rust subreddit, or Discord (or any other chat platform used by Rustaceans). If it's something about the feature tracked by the tracking issue, that isn't outlined in the RFC, then it might also be appropriate to drop a comment in the tracking issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @jonas-schievink@quixoticaxis

        Issue actions

          [NLL] Should this code compile with NLL? · Issue #67201 · rust-lang/rust