-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
coretasks: trying to improve docstrings #2001
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
dgw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, this ended up a bit scarier in terms of line-note count than I expected based on the diff size. It's pretty much all trivial stuff, though. I like!
Maybe you didn't notice but I tried hard to not forget about S everywhere. Also, I think I more or less remembered that "plurals' something" and not "plurals's something". |
6171b37 to
cd43d1e
Compare
cd43d1e to
81cf6d6
Compare
|
Fixed conflict and repushed. |
|
I'm going to trust that Exi's rebase didn't break anything. Did skim the current changes, but not in-depth. (Who wants to re-review things? Not this dgw!) |
Description
Working on #1565, for the
coretaskscore plugin. I wanted to do a quick first draft for @dgw to review.I'm not really proud of these docstrings. On the other hand, I think we need a full chapter to explain how Sopel initialize the connection, deal with SASL, WHO/WHOX/NAMES, and stuffs. So it's not really my biggest concern.
My biggest concern is the lack of test for this plugin. I might add them here, maybe. We'll see.
Checklist
make qa(runsmake qualityandmake test)