Skip to content

Skip password verification for PAM users (bsc#1245398) #10523

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aaannz
Copy link
Contributor

@aaannz aaannz commented Jun 27, 2025

What does this PR change?

This commit changes how PAM users password verification works. Instead of relying on additional variable, which was not correctly set, always rely on user PAM settings.
Also use PAM settings only in the actual password set routine in order not to hide some potential future errors.

GUI diff

No difference.

  • DONE

Documentation

  • No documentation needed: only internal and user invisible changes

  • DONE

Test coverage

ℹ️ If a major new functionality is added, it is strongly recommended that tests for the new functionality are added to the Cucumber test suite

  • Unit tests were added

  • DONE

Links

Issue(s): https://github.com/SUSE/spacewalk/issues/27630
Port(s): https://github.com/SUSE/spacewalk/pull/27639

  • DONE

Changelogs

Make sure the changelogs entries you are adding are compliant with https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Contributing#changelogs and https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Contributing#uyuni-projectuyuni-repository

If you don't need a changelog check, please mark this checkbox:

  • No changelog needed

If you uncheck the checkbox after the PR is created, you will need to re-run changelog_test (see below)

Re-run a test

If you need to re-run a test, please mark the related checkbox, it will be unchecked automatically once it has re-run:

  • Re-run test "changelog_test"
  • Re-run test "backend_unittests_pgsql"
  • Re-run test "java_pgsql_tests"
  • Re-run test "schema_migration_test_pgsql"
  • Re-run test "susemanager_unittests"
  • Re-run test "javascript_lint"
  • Re-run test "spacecmd_unittests"

Before you merge

Check How to branch and merge properly!

Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hello! Thanks for contributing to our project.
Acceptance tests will take some time (aprox. 1h), please be patient ☕

You can see the progress at the end of this page and at https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/pull/10523/checks
Once tests finish, if they fail, you can check 👀 the cucumber report. See the link at the output of the action.
You can also check the artifacts section, which contains the logs at https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/pull/10523/checks.

If you are unsure the failing tests are related to your code, you can check the "reference jobs". These are jobs that run on a scheduled time with code from master. If they fail for the same reason as your build, it means the tests or the infrastructure are broken. If they do not fail, but yours do, it means it is related to your code.

Reference tests:

KNOWN ISSUES

Sometimes the build can fail when pulling new jar files from download.opensuse.org . This is a known limitation. Given this happens rarely, when it does, all you need to do is rerun the test. Sorry for the inconvenience.

For more tips on troubleshooting, see the troubleshooting guide.

Happy hacking!
⚠️ You should not merge if acceptance tests fail to pass. ⚠️

@aaannz aaannz changed the title Skip password verification for PAM users Skip password verification for PAM users (bsc#1245398) Jun 27, 2025
This commit changes how PAM users password verification works.
Instead of relying on additional variable, which was not correctly
set, always rely on user PAM settings.
Also use PAM settings only in the actual password set routine in
order not to hide some potentional future errors.
@aaannz aaannz force-pushed the no-pass-validation-on-pam branch from 699f684 to f816d2f Compare June 27, 2025 11:59
@aaannz aaannz marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2025 12:35
@aaannz aaannz requested a review from a team as a code owner June 27, 2025 12:35
@aaannz aaannz requested review from CDellaGiusta and Serp1co and removed request for a team June 27, 2025 12:35
@@ -85,7 +86,7 @@ public CreateUserCommand() {
public ValidatorError[] validate() {
errors = new ArrayList<>(); //clear validation errors

if (passwordErrors != null && !user.getUsePamAuthentication()) {
Copy link
Contributor

@Serp1co Serp1co Jul 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we still enforce this: !user.getUsePamAuthentication() ? (i think we already do it somewhere up the flow and here the passwordErrors array will always be null)

just a nitpick, not really needed i think.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed it is done in the setPassword below. So we should not have any passwordErrors in case of PAM auth and if we have, it is a bug and IMO validator should report it.

Copy link
Contributor

@Serp1co Serp1co left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants