-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 501
[Bug] stormservice's headless service need set PublishNotReadyAddresses #1441
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug] stormservice's headless service need set PublishNotReadyAddresses #1441
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @bigerous, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a bug where pods within the same stormservice could not communicate via DNS before all target pods were fully ready. The change enables the publishNotReadyAddresses option on the headless service associated with stormservice instances. This ensures that DNS entries for the service include unready pods, facilitating scenarios like multi-node deployments (e.g., sglang) that require pods to resolve each other's DNS names even if they are not yet in a 'ready' state.
Highlights
- Headless Service Configuration: The
PublishNotReadyAddressesfield for theStormService's headless service is now set totrue. This ensures that even unready pods are included in the DNS entries, allowing for inter-pod communication via DNS before all pods are fully ready.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix a bug where pods of a stormservice cannot discover each other via DNS before they are ready. The proposed change correctly sets PublishNotReadyAddresses: true on the headless service spec. However, the review identified a significant issue: the change will not be applied to existing services because the equality check function (isServiceEqual) does not compare this new field. This makes the fix incomplete. I've provided a detailed comment on how to correct this, which involves updating isServiceEqual and the associated unit tests.
| Type: corev1.ServiceTypeClusterIP, | ||
| ClusterIP: corev1.ClusterIPNone, | ||
| Selector: map[string]string{constants.StormServiceNameLabelKey: service.Name}, | ||
| PublishNotReadyAddresses: true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While adding PublishNotReadyAddresses: true is correct for the intended purpose, the current implementation will not apply this change to existing headless services.
The isServiceEqual function, which is used to check if an update is needed, does not compare the PublishNotReadyAddresses field. As a result, the controller will not detect the difference for existing services and will not trigger an update. This makes the bug fix incomplete as it won't work for existing StormService resources.
To fix this, isServiceEqual in pkg/controller/stormservice/utils.go needs to be updated to include this check:
// isServiceEqual compares two Kubernetes Service objects for equality
func isServiceEqual(a, b *corev1.Service) bool {
return a.Spec.Type == b.Spec.Type &&
apiequality.Semantic.DeepEqual(a.Spec.Selector, b.Spec.Selector) &&
a.Spec.ClusterIP == b.Spec.ClusterIP &&
a.Spec.PublishNotReadyAddresses == b.Spec.PublishNotReadyAddresses
}Additionally, the test TestSyncHeadlessService in pkg/controller/stormservice/sync_test.go should be updated to assert that PublishNotReadyAddresses is set to true on the created/updated service to prevent future regressions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bigerous could you check the utils. for existing services, once user finish the upgrade, the service can be updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it. I have updated the utils and add ut test for this case.
466ed55 to
5490575
Compare
5490575 to
3a1a847
Compare
Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]>
86ea787 to
1376be0
Compare
…es (vllm-project#1441) * fix: stormservice's headless service need set PublishNotReadyAddresses Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]> * fix: isServiceEqual check PublishNotReadyAddresses Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]>
…se-0.4 branch (#1468) * Select PD workers in same roleset (#1409) * Select PD workers in same roleset * nit * update ut --------- Signed-off-by: Varun Gupta <[email protected]> * [Bug] fix webhook config output when using make manifests (#1412) fix webhook config output when using make manifests Signed-off-by: googs1025 <[email protected]> * [Fix] Fix vLLM NIXL-based P/D samples (#1425) Signed-off-by: Haiyang Shi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Haiyang Shi <[email protected]> * [Fix] Disable GGA in NIXL samples (#1436) [Fix] Fix NIXL samples Explicitly set UCX_TLS to let UCX not use GGA (GPU Direct) transport Signed-off-by: Haiyang Shi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Haiyang Shi <[email protected]> * Fix P/D disaggregation router to follow Nixl kv_transfer_params (#1429) - Add kv_transfer_params configuration to prefill requests and decode requests Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Shan <[email protected]> * [Bug] Corrected naming convention for AIBRIX_MODEL_GPU_PROFILE_CACHING_FLAG (#1427) Corrected naming convention for AIBRIX_MODEL_GPU_PROFILE_CACHING_FLAG Signed-off-by: Jonathon Shea <[email protected]> * [Bug] stormservice's headless service not set ownerRef (#1442) * fix: stormservice's headless service not set ownerRef Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]> * fix: patch ut test for service sync Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]> * [Bug] stormservice's headless service need set PublishNotReadyAddresses (#1441) * fix: stormservice's headless service need set PublishNotReadyAddresses Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]> * fix: isServiceEqual check PublishNotReadyAddresses Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Varun Gupta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: googs1025 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Shi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Shan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jonathon Shea <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: dajun.cui <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Varun Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: CYJiang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Haiyang Shi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Haiyang Shi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jonathon Shea <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: cuidajun <[email protected]>
Pull Request Description
StormServiceController will Create a headless service assocaited with stormservice. The headless service's
publishNotReadyAddressesoption is false (by default), only ready Pods get listed in DNS. This will cause pod of the same stormservice can not reach each other by dns name like<pod-name>.<service-name>.<namespace>.svc.cluster.localbefore target pod is ready. Reaching another pod by dns name before pod is ready is needed in some cases like sglang's multi-node deployment:When publishNotReadyAddresses is true: Pods that aren’t ready yet (per readiness probes) will also be included in the DNS entries for the service.
Related Issues
Resolves: #[Insert issue number(s)]
Important: Before submitting, please complete the description above and review the checklist below.
Contribution Guidelines (Expand for Details)
We appreciate your contribution to aibrix! To ensure a smooth review process and maintain high code quality, please adhere to the following guidelines:
Pull Request Title Format
Your PR title should start with one of these prefixes to indicate the nature of the change:
[Bug]: Corrections to existing functionality[CI]: Changes to build process or CI pipeline[Docs]: Updates or additions to documentation[API]: Modifications to aibrix's API or interface[CLI]: Changes or additions to the Command Line Interface[Misc]: For changes not covered above (use sparingly)Note: For changes spanning multiple categories, use multiple prefixes in order of importance.
Submission Checklist
By submitting this PR, you confirm that you've read these guidelines and your changes align with the project's contribution standards.