Skip to content

Conversation

@happyandslow
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Description

This PR fixes missing traffic_pattern parameters in benchmark script

Related Issues

Resolves: #1470

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @happyandslow, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an issue where critical traffic pattern parameters were not being correctly applied in the benchmark script. The primary change introduces a more robust and flexible configuration for synthetic workloads, allowing users to define traffic, prompt, and completion length patterns using either newly added preset options or existing file-based configurations. Additionally, a small improvement for API key handling has been included to prevent common configuration pitfalls.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Synthetic Workload Configuration: The benchmark script's synthetic workload configuration has been significantly enhanced to offer more flexibility. Users can now choose between using predefined 'preset_patterns' for traffic, prompt length, and completion length, or continue to specify custom 'pattern_files'. This change is reflected in both the benchmark.py script's logic and the config.yaml structure.
  • API Key Handling Improvement: A minor but important improvement has been added to the run_client method in benchmark.py. It now includes logic to check if the api_key is still set to its default placeholder value ('${API_KEY}'). If detected, a warning is logged, and the key is automatically set to "key" to prevent potential issues during execution.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the benchmark script to handle different traffic pattern configurations for synthetic workloads. My review focuses on improving code clarity, fixing a potential bug in API key handling, and correcting a minor typo in the configuration file. I've suggested a refactoring to reduce code duplication in benchmark.py, a fix for incorrect API key handling that could lead to authentication errors, and a correction for a double slash in a file path in config.yaml.

Le Xu and others added 5 commits August 20, 2025 09:59
Signed-off-by: Le Xu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Le Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Le Xu <[email protected]>
@Jeffwan Jeffwan force-pushed the lexu/missing-benchmark-config-params-fix branch from afde05d to 958eff8 Compare August 20, 2025 01:59
@Jeffwan Jeffwan merged commit 9e4287b into vllm-project:main Aug 20, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AIBrix benchmark:'Namespace' object has no attribute 'traffic_pattern

2 participants