-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 500
Fix missing traffic_pattern parameters in benchmark script #1484
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix missing traffic_pattern parameters in benchmark script #1484
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @happyandslow, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses an issue where critical traffic pattern parameters were not being correctly applied in the benchmark script. The primary change introduces a more robust and flexible configuration for synthetic workloads, allowing users to define traffic, prompt, and completion length patterns using either newly added preset options or existing file-based configurations. Additionally, a small improvement for API key handling has been included to prevent common configuration pitfalls.
Highlights
- Enhanced Synthetic Workload Configuration: The benchmark script's synthetic workload configuration has been significantly enhanced to offer more flexibility. Users can now choose between using predefined 'preset_patterns' for traffic, prompt length, and completion length, or continue to specify custom 'pattern_files'. This change is reflected in both the
benchmark.pyscript's logic and theconfig.yamlstructure. - API Key Handling Improvement: A minor but important improvement has been added to the
run_clientmethod inbenchmark.py. It now includes logic to check if theapi_keyis still set to its default placeholder value ('${API_KEY}'). If detected, a warning is logged, and the key is automatically set to "key" to prevent potential issues during execution.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the benchmark script to handle different traffic pattern configurations for synthetic workloads. My review focuses on improving code clarity, fixing a potential bug in API key handling, and correcting a minor typo in the configuration file. I've suggested a refactoring to reduce code duplication in benchmark.py, a fix for incorrect API key handling that could lead to authentication errors, and a correction for a double slash in a file path in config.yaml.
Signed-off-by: Le Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Le Xu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Le Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Le Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Le Xu <[email protected]>
afde05d to
958eff8
Compare
Pull Request Description
This PR fixes missing traffic_pattern parameters in benchmark script
Related Issues
Resolves: #1470