-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 500
[Misc]: add podset integration test #1533
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @googs1025, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances the testing infrastructure by introducing a new integration test for the PodSet controller. It aims to validate the controller's core functionalities, such as correctly provisioning and managing pods based on PodSet specifications and accurately reflecting their status. This ensures the robustness and reliability of the PodSet orchestration logic.
Highlights
- New Integration Test for PodSet Controller: Introduces a comprehensive integration test suite for the PodSet controller, verifying its behavior during resource creation, pod reconciliation, and status transitions from Pending to Ready.
- PodSet Test Utility Wrapper: Adds a PodSetWrapper utility in test/utils/wrapper to provide a fluent API for constructing PodSet objects, simplifying test setup and improving readability.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces valuable integration tests for the PodSet controller, enhancing the project's test coverage and reliability. The implementation includes a new test suite and a helper wrapper for constructing PodSet objects. My review focuses on improving this new test wrapper by addressing a compilation error, enhancing its consistency with the controller's behavior, and correcting a default value to align with the Custom Resource Definition (CRD) validation rules. These changes will make the test utilities more robust and accurate.
97b8998 to
20753d9
Compare
|
I merged #1537, Seems there's one line of conflict in the stormservice spec. Seems rebase works.. |
Signed-off-by: googs1025 <[email protected]>
20753d9 to
35688bd
Compare
|
overall looks good to me. I left some minor comments |
Pull Request Description
[Please provide a clear and concise description of your changes here]
Related Issues
Resolves: #[Insert issue number(s)]
part of: #1430
Important: Before submitting, please complete the description above and review the checklist below.
Contribution Guidelines (Expand for Details)
We appreciate your contribution to aibrix! To ensure a smooth review process and maintain high code quality, please adhere to the following guidelines:
Pull Request Title Format
Your PR title should start with one of these prefixes to indicate the nature of the change:
[Bug]: Corrections to existing functionality[CI]: Changes to build process or CI pipeline[Docs]: Updates or additions to documentation[API]: Modifications to aibrix's API or interface[CLI]: Changes or additions to the Command Line Interface[Misc]: For changes not covered above (use sparingly)Note: For changes spanning multiple categories, use multiple prefixes in order of importance.
Submission Checklist
By submitting this PR, you confirm that you've read these guidelines and your changes align with the project's contribution standards.