Skip to content

Improve configs - TokenizerPoolConfig + DeviceConfig #16603

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

hmellor
Copy link
Member

@hmellor hmellor commented Apr 14, 2025

Follows #16332, #16422, #16533

Notable changes:

  • Correctly handle default_factory=dict
  • Better type hint for get_kwargs in args_utils.py

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

hmellor added 8 commits April 14, 2025 20:03
Signed-off-by: Harry Mellor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harry Mellor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harry Mellor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harry Mellor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harry Mellor <[email protected]>
@@ -2021,9 +2036,19 @@ def is_multi_step(self) -> bool:
return self.num_scheduler_steps > 1


Device = Literal["auto", "cuda", "neuron", "cpu", "tpu", "xpu", "hpu"]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can't really hard code this because OOT platforms may use different names

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is already hard coded by EngineArgs using choices=DEVICE_OPTIONS

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @youkaichao is that intended?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To summarise:

  • The argparser behaviour is unchanged
  • In the config we have Literal type hinting (no validation of the input occurrs)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is already hard coded by EngineArgs using choices=DEVICE_OPTIONS

usually people just use device="auto" and let the current_platform resolve the device, so i think it should be fine.

i don't see lots of usage with explicitly adding --device=xxx

Copy link
Member

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, he seems busy so I'll just approve this for now

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 enabled auto-merge (squash) April 17, 2025 09:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Apr 17, 2025
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 merged commit d27ea94 into vllm-project:main Apr 17, 2025
62 checks passed
lionelvillard pushed a commit to lionelvillard/vllm that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
@hmellor hmellor deleted the improve-tokenizer-and-device-config branch April 17, 2025 14:33
yangw-dev pushed a commit to yangw-dev/vllm that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2025
jikunshang pushed a commit to jikunshang/vllm that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2025
lk-chen pushed a commit to lk-chen/vllm that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2025
adobrzyn pushed a commit to HabanaAI/vllm-fork that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
…t#16603)

Signed-off-by: Harry Mellor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Agata Dobrzyniewicz <[email protected]>
RichardoMrMu pushed a commit to RichardoMrMu/vllm that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants