Make meta data converter mapping generic and populate provisioner meta info

[shobha2626]

1. What this PR does / why we need it:

Make meta data converter mapping generic and populate provisioner meta info

Meta converter was not supporting the array format as that of a provisioner resource. As a result, meta was not getting populated for provisioner because the model path was not including the entire path. In Provisioner resource scenario the meta should be provisioner.meta.

Made changes to accomodate this change not just for provisioner but any resource that follows this structure

3. Which issue(s) this PR fixes

{ "version": 4, "terraform_version": "1.6.4", "serial": 1, "lineage": "2dcd02f2-3dcc-d8a3-42b1-f05b03f9e9fe", "outputs": {}, "resources": [ { "mode": "data", "type": "tanzu-mission-control_provisioner", "name": "read_provisioner", "provider": "provider[\"vmware/devd/tanzu-mission-control\"]", "instances": [ { "schema_version": 0, "attributes": { "id": "prvn:01HQ2DV4SAY0C5G832WHZ4TBST", "provisioners": [ { "management_cluster": "eks", "meta": [ { "annotations": {}, "description": "Create provisioner through terraform", "labels": { "key1": "value1", "key2": "value2" }, "resource_version": "4965", "uid": "prvn:01HQ2DV4SAY0C5G832WHZ4TBST" } ], "name": "mshobha-test", "org_id": "" } ] }, "sensitive_attributes": [] } ] } ], "check_results": null }

    (optional, in `fixes #<issue number>` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):

    Fixes #

4. Additional information

5. Special notes for your reviewer

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (aa47e00) 25.36% compared to head (c178b75) 25.36%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
internal/resources/common/objectmeta_schema.go	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #380   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   25.36%   25.36%           
=======================================
  Files         195      195           
  Lines       16810    16810           
=======================================
  Hits         4264     4264           
  Misses      12328    12328           
  Partials      218      218           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ankitsny]

LGTM

[ramya-bangera]

@shobha2626 - Does the state file dump given in description captures the state file info with LIST or GET datasource? If it's just GET can you add the LIST too? As there are changes to common meta converter code have you validated the automation against your change?

[shobha2626]

@shobha2626 - Does the state file dump given in description captures the state file info with LIST or GET datasource? If it's just GET can you add the LIST too? As there are changes to common meta converter code have you validated the automation against your change?

@ramya-bangera I have captured only GET because the result for LIST is huge. I have verified the LIST as well, if needed I can run again and share the same.
I have validate this change against other resource like namespace and workspace manually and there seems to be no issue. It is optional parameter and shouldn't cause any.

[ramya-bangera]

@shobha2626 - Does the state file dump given in description captures the state file info with LIST or GET datasource? If it's just GET can you add the LIST too? As there are changes to common meta converter code have you validated the automation against your change?

@ramya-bangera I have captured only GET because the result for LIST is huge. I have verified the LIST as well, if needed I can run again and share the same. I have validate this change against other resource like namespace and workspace manually and there seems to be no issue. It is optional parameter and shouldn't cause any.

Thanks for confirming , since these details was missing I just wanted to be sure that it is validated.

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.