Skip to content

fix: compute proper chainId value on useReadConstracts to avoid unnecessary queryKey mutations #4657

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

agsola
Copy link

@agsola agsola commented May 8, 2025

fix: compute proper chainId value on useReadConstracts to avoid unnecessary queryKey mutations

Derives a unified chainId from contracts when all share the same value, otherwise falls back to the default (chainId from useChainId).

This fixes 'queryKey' mutation when connecting or changing network despite all contracts sharing the same chainId, avoid unnecessary mutations and equating to the default behaviour on useReadContract.

…essary queryKey mutations

Derives a unified chainId from contracts when all share the same value, otherwise falls back to the default (chainId from useChainId).

This fixes 'queryKey' mutation when connecting or changing network despite all contracts sharing the same chainId, avoid unnecessary mutations and equating to the default behaviour on useReadContract.
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 8, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 90c66c8

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
wagmi Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 8, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
wagmi ❌ Failed (Inspect) May 23, 2025 10:41am

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant