[-claude__skills__browser-extension-developer] Fix #3: Missing validation feedback loop

[RichardHightower]

Fix #3: Missing validation feedback loop

Severity: Low | Pillar: Utility | Impact: +2 points

Problem

No explicit validation checklist before submitting changes

Location

SKILL.md:end

Current Code

Run lint and tests before completion

Suggested Fix

Add checklist: [ ] Lint passes [ ] Tests pass [ ] Tested in Chrome [ ] Tested in Firefox [ ] i18n keys match across all languages

---

Part of Skill Grading Report

Powered by: SkillzWave.ai | SpillWave

[github-actions]

Related Issues

I found some similar issues that might be helpful:

• Skill Grading Report: browser-extension-developer - Score 75/100 (C) #1037 - Skill Grading Report: browser-extension-developer - Score 75/100 (C) - This is the parent grading report that identified this issue (Fix chore: Add ignore filter tests and improve ci #3) along with other improvements for the browser-extension-developer skill
• [-claude__skills__browser-extension-developer] Fix #1: Missing workflow steps #1039 - Fix #1: Missing workflow steps - Related improvement suggesting adding numbered workflow steps to SKILL.md, which could be combined with this validation checklist
• [-claude__skills__browser-extension-developer] Fix #2: No troubleshooting section #1040 - Fix #2: No troubleshooting section - Another SKILL.md improvement addressing the Notes section, could potentially be addressed together

These issues all target improving the browser-extension-developer skill and could be addressed together in a single PR.

[yamadashy]

Closing as not planned. This appears to be an auto-generated issue from an external service (SkillzWave) with promotional content. The suggestions are not actionable for this project.

[RichardHightower]

From the article from Anthropic:

https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/best-practices

Implement feedback loops
Common pattern: Run validator → fix errors → repeat

This pattern greatly improves output quality.

Example 1: Style guide compliance (for Skills without code):

Content review process

1. Draft your content following the guidelines in STYLE_GUIDE.md
2. Review against the checklist:
   • Check terminology consistency
   • Verify examples follow the standard format
   • Confirm all required sections are present
3. If issues found:
   • Note each issue with specific section reference
   • Revise the content
   • Review the checklist again
4. Only proceed when all requirements are met
5. Finalize and save the document
   This shows the validation loop pattern using reference documents instead of scripts. The "validator" is STYLE_GUIDE.md, and Claude performs the check by reading and comparing.

Example 2: Document editing process (for Skills with code):

Document editing process

1. Make your edits to word/document.xml
2. Validate immediately: python ooxml/scripts/validate.py unpacked_dir/
3. If validation fails:
   • Review the error message carefully
   • Fix the issues in the XML
   • Run validation again
4. Only proceed when validation passes
5. Rebuild: python ooxml/scripts/pack.py unpacked_dir/ output.docx
6. Test the output document
   The validation loop catches errors early.