Skip to content

Conversation

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor

@PlasmaPower PlasmaPower commented Jun 2, 2017

When I'm glancing through emails, I have to look closely to see what πŸ™†β€β™€οΈ and πŸ™… are. It'd be a lot easier with β›” and βœ…. The different colors make it a lot clearer.

@rhengles
Copy link
Member

rhengles commented Jun 2, 2017

Personally, I prefer more πŸ†— or βœ… than πŸŽ‰ .

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor Author

PlasmaPower commented Jun 2, 2017

@rhengles βœ… looks like a good choice. Changed.

Thoughts on the stale PR with merge conflicts emoji? It was πŸ™…. I changed it to πŸ’” as it's a bit different than β›”. I'm reconsidering that though. Which does everyone else prefer?

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andrewda Re-review needed after change

@mark-i-m
Copy link
Contributor

mark-i-m commented Jun 2, 2017

@PlasmaPower Have you just been stockpiling PRs?

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mark-i-m I stockpile ideas, then sometimes I feel like doing stuff.

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor Author

PlasmaPower commented Jun 2, 2017

I have chaosbot's full attention - literally all the PRs it is processing right now are mine πŸ˜„.

@mark-i-m
Copy link
Contributor

mark-i-m commented Jun 2, 2017

Shameless plug: #420

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mark-i-m yeah I'm really appreciating that right now.

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor Author

PlasmaPower commented Jun 2, 2017

Now includes stalled CI failed message (recently merged).

@chaosbot chaosbot merged commit 2970afc into Chaosthebot:master Jun 2, 2017
@chaosbot
Copy link
Collaborator

chaosbot commented Jun 2, 2017

πŸ™†β€β™€οΈ PR passed with a vote of 10 for and 0 against, a weighted total of 10.0 and a threshold of 6.5, and a current meritocracy review.

See merge-commit 2970afc for more details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants