-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
Change DQM modules to use stage-2 L1T #37033
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37033/28462
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_10 had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_210 had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_220 had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_20 had ERRORS and more ... RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37033/28465
|
Pull request #37033 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild , please test |
… fillDescriptions
tvami#5 this seems to make it go through. |
add rest of parameters for GenericTriggerEventFlag in configuration / fillDescriptions
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37033/28485
|
Pull request #37033 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9a15df/22620/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Yay, diffs show no changes, that's great I guess that means these tags were not really used anywhere indeed, otherwise I'd have expected at least some changes in the plots. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@cms-sw/orp-l2 can we please merge this in the 2300 IB? Just so I can remove the tag from the GT in that IB |
+1 |
PR description:
Based on #37016 (comment)
this PR moves different DQM modules to use stage-2 L1T
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A
Resolves #37016