-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
[15.0.X] New HLT Scouting DQM Online Client #48450
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[15.0.X] New HLT Scouting DQM Online Client #48450
Conversation
…M unit test, use scouting rho
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for CMSSW_15_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @mmusich, @rseidita can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
cms-bot internal usage |
test parameters: |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+hlt
|
@cmsbuild, please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#9959 |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+dqm |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_15_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_15_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport of #48398
PR description:
Following the discussion at CMSHLT-3571 and last weeks HLT Scouting meeting , we are introducing a new HLT Scouting DQM online client to include the new
DQMOnlineScouting
stream. We are adding the client and adaptingBuildFile.xml
to include unit testing for the new client as well.PR validation:
See master PR. Also relies on unit test of this package
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Verbatim backport of #48398 to the 2025 data-taking release.
@jprendi FYI.