Skip to content

[9.0] (backport #8377) [CI] BK Vault plugin for EC access #8795

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 9.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jul 2, 2025

What does this PR do?

Introduces BK Vault plugin. Simplifies EC access and prevents possible issues
Windows retry tested in this build

Why is it important?

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the pull request guidelines of this project.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in ./changelog/fragments using the changelog tool
  • I have added an integration test or an E2E test

Disruptive User Impact

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Questions to ask yourself

  • How are we going to support this in production?
  • How are we going to measure its adoption?
  • How are we going to debug this?
  • What are the metrics I should take care of?
  • ...

This is an automatic backport of pull request #8377 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

* [CI] BK Vault plugin for ES access

* Typo

* Typo

* Quick Windows test

* Quick test Windows

* Revert last two commits

* Applied proposed changes

* Fixed indentation

* revert buildkite_analytics_token deletion

* Remaned the anchor

* Added the issue to comments

* Updated FIPS pipeline

(cherry picked from commit e2505e4)

# Conflicts:
#	.buildkite/bk.integration-fips.pipeline.yml
@mergify mergify bot added backport conflicts There is a conflict in the backported pull request labels Jul 2, 2025
@mergify mergify bot requested review from a team as code owners July 2, 2025 13:42
@mergify mergify bot assigned pazone Jul 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Cherry-pick of e2505e4 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/9.0/pr-8377
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/9.0'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit e2505e453.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   .buildkite/bk.integration.pipeline.yml
	modified:   .buildkite/hooks/pre-command
	modified:   .buildkite/scripts/steps/ess.ps1
	modified:   .buildkite/scripts/steps/ess.sh

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
	deleted by us:   .buildkite/bk.integration-fips.pipeline.yml

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

@mergify mergify bot mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2025
8 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request skip-changelog labels Jul 2, 2025
@pazone pazone removed the conflicts There is a conflict in the backported pull request label Jul 2, 2025
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

cc @pazone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants